Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ti Chen vs Michael Mmoh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chen vs Mmoh analysis and find out who is favored!
Ti Chen vs Michael Mmoh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chen 1 - 0 Mmoh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mmoh has won 46.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mmoh has won 49.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mmoh has saved 59.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mmoh winning 54.55% (W/L 30/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 621/ 380), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chen winning 1 times and Mmoh being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chen winning 2 and Mmoh winning 0. The last match between Chen and Mmoh was at the Qatar F1, 31-03-2014, Quarterfinals, Hard with Ti Chen getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chen and Mmoh have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chen winning 0 times and Mmoh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chen winning 0, and Mmoh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mmoh has played against players with an average rank of 233.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mmoh has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mmoh has converted 43.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
184
High
40
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
116
Rank
81
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
60% (683-461)
Career Total W/L
58% (286-207)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (8-12)
$57,495
Career Prize Money
$1,164,400
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ti Chen vs Michael Mmoh For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Chen VS Mmoh
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Ti Chen | Michael Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ti Chen | Michael Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (8/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (20/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (204/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.53 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 172.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (856/1312) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (607/856) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (211/456) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (47/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (473/1287) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Ti Chen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Ti Chen
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rishi Reddy
Player
Ti Chen
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Ti Chen
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Geun Jun Kim
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 7-5 10-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tsung-Hua Yang
Player
Ti Chen
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
64
|
6-7(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ti Chen
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Han-Chih Lin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Michael Mmoh
43%
(
34 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Chen Vs Mmoh Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Chen are available here and Mmoh photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
